Re: Philotype(TM) Selector was Re: conreligion selector
| From: | Lars Henrik Mathiesen <thorinn@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, September 24, 2001, 11:13 |
|---|
> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:11:42 -0500
> From: Andrew Chaney <adchaney@...>
>
> I got Baconian, Epicurean, Aristotelian, Newtonian, Ockamian,
> Stoic/Aurelian, Thomist, Kantian, Lockean, Randian, Humean,
> Platonic/Socratic, Augustinian (in that order).
>
> ..and they're all wrong. Oh well. Vive la unclassifiable.
Well, I got Baconian, Aristotelian, Epicurean, Lockean, Newtonian,
Ockamian, Stoic/Aurelian, Thomist, Kantian, Humean, Platonic/Socratic,
Randian, Augustinian.
Which I'm pretty well satisfied with. Except for the scurrilous and
preposterous claim that I should have misused the word 'orthogonal.'
Lars Mathiesen (U of Copenhagen CS Dep) <thorinn@...> (Humour NOT marked)