dying NATLANGS as CONLANGS
|From:||Daniel Prohaska <danielprohaska@...>|
|Date:||Wednesday, April 12, 2006, 16:45|
That sounds like a grand idea. You have my full moral support!
From: Constructed Languages List [mailto:CONLANG@listserv.brown.edu] On Behalf
Of Jörg Rhiemeier
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: Dying NATLANGS as CONLANGS?
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:56:40 -0800, Michael Adams wrote:
> Grin, but why not..
> Languages that are now almost or are dead, and use them as
> Conlangs, and modify them as you see fit?
Why not? One of my projects (currently indefinitely put aside) is Modern
Vandalic, a member of the extinct East Germanic branch; I'll evolve it
...brought to you by the Weeping Elf