Re: inalienable possession

Christophe Grandsire wrote:
>         Yes, at present, they just don't exist. That doesn't mean that they
> can't exist, or that they never existed (maybe a language now extinct
> without any descendor had a split-nominative like Sally's one). Who knows?
> There are only 5000 languages all over the world, and certainly millions
> (perhaps an infinity) of systems that could be languages. So it's normal for
> me to think that everything is possible.
Okay, granted some unattested systems quite possibly existed somewhere,
but not all.  I seriously doubt that a center-embedding system could
exist, the human brain simply can't handle it.  I'm confident that there
*are* systems that simply can't exist in human languages.  Perhaps some
that we think are impossible are actually possible, but I don't think
that every unattested system is possible.  The human brain can only
process certain types of systems.

--
"It has occured to me more than once that holy boredom is good and
sufficient reason for the invention of free will." - "Lord Leto II"
(Dune Chronicles, by Frank Herbert)
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/X-Files/
ICQ #: 18656696
AOL screen-name: NikTailor