Re: CHAT: Unconventional pronoun systemsshow us yours!
From: | Chris Bates <chris.maths_student@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 11:24 |
I think it'd be cool to have a split ergative system (ergative marking
for non-persons, accusative for persons and verbal markers), but deal
with indirect objects in bitransitive sentences differently in the two
systems. The scheme for people:
NOM case = ACTOR of transitive, argument of intransitive
ACC case = RECIPIENT of bitransitive, PATIENT of transitive
SECONDARY = PATIENT of bitransitive
The scheme for other things:
ERG = ACTOR of transitive
ABS = OBJECT of bitransitive, OBJECT of transitive, argument of intransitive
SECONDARY = RECIPIENT of bitransitive
This seems like a scheme that might actually occur, since recipient is
higher on the animacy scale than patient, so it seems like a non person
being the recipient of a bitransitive sentence would be more marked than
it being the patient, but you'd assume the opposite for a person. Are
there natural languages with split ergative systems which deal with
recipients differently depending on which case system is being used?