Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: USAGE: gotten

From:Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...>
Date:Sunday, June 23, 2002, 11:05
Quoting Tristan McLeay <kesuari@...>:

> I was just installing Windows XP today and happened to notice that it > said 'If you've had a computer before, you've probably GOTTEN things the > way you like it', or some-such like that (the actual wording isn't > important, 'gotten' there is being used in the same way as it was on the > banner). > > 'Gotten' there seems wrong to me (and my younger brother, who generally > speaks more Americanly than I do). Is that some usage of 'gotten' that > hasn't (yet) passed into Australian English, or is it ungrammatical in > the US too and just somehow managed to slip through?
Almost all varieties of American English have two functionally distinct past participles of the verb <get>: <got>, which is homophonous with the preterite form, and <gotten> which is not. The former is used only when "I've got (to)" is equivalent to "I have" or "I must". In all other circumstances, <gotten> is used. <gotten> is actually the original form that predominated in the US until the above exceptions were imported from Britain. This is one of those instances where American English preserves an archaic feature no longer current in British English, much like Americans still often say "fall" for the season known in Britain as "autumn". (Likewise, sometimes RP has features that strike Americans as old-fashioned, like the use of "amongst" instead of "among".)
> (My brother suggested that 'gotten' is used more to mean 'received', > although 'I've gotten it' sounds wrong to me, too... I never (rarely) > use 'gotten'; my younger brother does.)
That's interesting. Does that suggest that your brother's use of English is heavily influenced by American dialect? ObConlang: Phaleran uses two distinct lexical items to distinguish between possession of animate things (ksoswa, dial. kwa), and inanimate things (c'aswa). Use of the verb for inanimates with humans strongly implies that the human referred to is enslaved: Sorkwa eulta c'aswasti, six slave.ABS have.TR.1SgProgRe.Sen ai phwalir kwamiltes*. and seven.ORD buy-slave.1SgProsRe.Cog "I have six slaves, and am probably going to buy a seventh." Replacing <c'aswasti> with its animate counterpart <ksoswasti> would imply something along the lines that there are six slaves that you personally have as friends, and you are going to buy yourself a seventh such friend. Obviously, such a reading is pragmatically marked. * The verb "kwami" is defective, in that it does not mark transitivity except in valence changing operations like the passive and antipassive. Some dialects have taken this as model to create a sporadically productive alternative transitive marker -mi-. Because this is homophonous with the standard Phaleran -mi- that marks reflexive, reciprocative and middle constructions, it is still quite rare. In these dialects, a different lexical verb for slave-buying, _xemi-_ is used in these other voices. ===================================================================== Thomas Wier "...koruphàs hetéras hetére:isi prosápto:n / Dept. of Linguistics mú:tho:n mè: teléein atrapòn mían..." University of Chicago "To join together diverse peaks of thought / 1010 E. 59th Street and not complete one road that has no turn" Chicago, IL 60637 Empedocles, _On Nature_, on speculative thinkers

Reply

Tristan McLeay <kesuari@...>