Re: OT: Language & clans? Re: OT: Ukraine
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 19:24 |
Chris Bates wrote at 2004-11-30 16:00:39 (+0000)
> Well, of course different languages have different terms for such
> things depending on the structure of the societies who speak that
> language: for instance, English is probably not ideal for talking
> about the intricacies of the old system of family, clans etc of
> some of the Native Americans, since most English nations aren't
> organised in exactly that way. Its similar to the way family terms
> and what they cover vary from language to language depending on
> what's required and what people think its important to disguish in
> conversation, but even though they change, there are key concepts
> which don't tend to (I doubt many languages commonly employ family
> terms that span different generations, for instance a word that
> means "brother"/"uncle" seems unlikely to me. The exception I'd say
> is the very general eg "relative").
Even in English, "cousin" spans generations*. And look at Dani:
http://www.umanitoba.ca/anthropology/tutor/kinterms/dani.html
* Granted the prototype is a (first) cousin, no times removed, and
other sorts tend not to come up much. But if you speak of, say, "a
distant cousin" there's no guarantee that you're in the same
generation.