Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: A new Indo-European subfamily in China

From:E-Ching Ng <e-ching.ng@...>
Date:Sunday, December 3, 2000, 23:08
Danny Wier wrote:

>Hey, welcome to the list! Ever heard of Tocharian? That's an IE >language, actually two, that were spoken somewhere in China.
Thanks for the welcome, Danny. I know of the existence of Tocharian, but no specifics until the professor unveils its wonders in class next week.
>Some IE languages that developed tonality: Panjabi (voiceless-voiced >distinction of stops merged into voiceless, but replaced by high-low >tone), Serbo-Croatian, Swedish. Lithuanian and Classical Greek preserved >the prosodic tones of PIE; the former lost the complex tone so it's just >rising and falling tone.
There is a small but annoying distinction between tonal and pitch-accent languages, I believe. Tonal languages have a certain compulsory tone for every morpheme (okay, I can think of a few exceptions in Mandarin and Hokkien which are said to have no tone, but they're rare and in unstressed positions). Pitch-accent languages use tone the way other languages use stress - it gets distributed by word or sentence. Swedish, Lithuanian and classical Greek are definitely pitch-accent, and I suspect Serbo-Croatian is too. Punjabi just might be tonal. It's almost close enough to the Himalayas for that to have caught on, but that's still a little far off. I have been gnawing on the question of whether Singlish (Singaporean English) is pitch-accent or tonal. In the basolect (really informal Singlish, unintelligible to the uninitiated) some words definitely have invariant tone - ironically I think that gets lost as you move into the acrolect (educated English that still retains regional features). Opinion from H S Teoh? Manglish (Malaysian English) works differently, I'm sure, but the differences might throw light on this question.
>I'm curious as to how Sino-Tibetan tones developed from Sino-Caucasian, >since North Caucasian languages are usually non-tonal (but much more >complex in consonant phonologies).
I am in the dark about Sino-Caucasian ... what are the Caucasian languages, and how certain is it that they're related to Sino-Tibetan? E-Ching