Re: A new Indo-European subfamily in China
| From: | Danny Wier <dawier@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Tuesday, December 5, 2000, 0:31 |
|---|
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 02:33:15 -0500 Adam Walker <dreamertwo@...>
writes:
(this is also in reply to other posters on the subject of Sino-Cauc)
> I *believe* that it only claims NORTH Caucasian. I believe South
> Caucasian
> or Kartvelian is included in Nostratic.
Sergei Starostin is a promoter of the Sino-Caucasian theory; his version
includes North (NOT South) Caucasian, Sino-Tibetan, and Ket-Yenisseian.
South Caucasian or Kartvelian is indeed considered Nostratic by that
macrofamily's promoters; it is also included in Joseph Greenberg's
Eurasian.
DaW.