Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Re : Using numberless substantives

From:Jim Henry <jimhenry@...>
Date:Wednesday, June 30, 1999, 20:54
On 29 Jun 99, at 18:27, xavo@bbvnet.com wrote:

> Tem Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:33:19 +0000, "Jim Henry" <jimhenry@...> > skribis: > > >> (well, in fact, I've read "claw" is "ungego" (big nail), but I don't > > > >Both "ungo" and "ungego" are used, but speakers might differ > >about exactly where to draw the line. > > > >> find it very logical) > > > >Why? > > Well, ungego hasn't necessarily to be a big "ungo". For example, my > ungoj are bigger than the ungegoj of my cat (and yes, I cut my nails > from time to time). > > Or perhaps I've understood it bad, and Eo has not any word for "claw", > and ungego is just used for big nails.
ungo = claw or nail ega != granda "-eg" is an intensifier or augmentive suffix, not just an adj meaning "big". "ungego" makes sense to me as meaning "a really *intense* 'ungo'", which maps more or less to English "claw". Which just goes to show how complex comparative semantics can get....
> > >> But then you would be using "one" almost all the time (if you don't > >> want to be vague)... > > > >Context could indicate "one" a lot of the time. > > "My cat smiles". How do you know whether it's one or several cats > (apart from -s in "smiles") if nouns are numberless?
You'd likely be talking to someone who knows you & your cat(s) ... if not, use the "one" marker.
> > >In {gzb} I have three set suffixes corresponding to Esperanto "-aro" > > > >-cu ( a functional system of X) (organaro -> nxiqw-cu) > > > >-daj (a group of X in one place), (arbaro -> hqun-daj ) > > > >-zla (the whole set of X everywhere) (homaro -> max-zla) > > Interesting. I'll think of that for my loglang, though I can also have > -ar- as an improductive suffix, giving its precise meaning on the > definition of the (improductively) formed word. >
In both cases there's a trade off to offer precision, vs. forcing speakers to make lexical/grammatical decisions they mayn't always want to make. I'd suggest letting your -ar- borrowing be vague, let speakers use it when they don't want/need the precision of other affixes.
> > > Saludos, > Marcos >
Jim Henry III Jim.Henry@pobox.com http://www.pobox.com/~jim.henry/conlang.htm Conlang list archives (1996), {gzb}, Thauliralau, Esperanto