Re: R: Re: R: orthographical question.
|From:||Scott W. Hlad <scott@...>|
|Date:||Sunday, April 1, 2001, 17:37|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Constructed Languages List [mailto:CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU]On
> Behalf Of John Cowan
> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 7:59 PM
> To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
> Subject: Re: R: Re: R: orthographical question.
> Frank George Valoczy scripsit:
> > That's the thing...it's wasn't. Umlaut was with a tilde, this
> was clearly
> > a breve, and in a place where you wouldn't have umlaut, example the u in
> > flugzeug (second u that is).
> Maybe it was similar to the mark used over Cyrillic i in old-fashioned
> Russian handwriting, that makes it easier to read; it shows which
> up-strokes go together.
> John Cowan email@example.com
> One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
> --Douglas Hofstadter