Re: THEORY: Evolution of infixes/ablaut?
From: | Patrick Dunn <tb0pwd1@...> |
Date: | Thursday, March 16, 2000, 17:50 |
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Padraic Brown wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Patrick Dunn wrote:
>
> >Hatasoe uses infixes, but I don't know *how* the evolved. English only
> >has one infix -- namely, -fucking-, as in "absolfuckinglutely." It's
> >evidently an intensifier. (Note: I've actually seen this in a linguistics
> >textbook, so don't go getting offended on me :) )
>
> Well, _any_ of Those Kinds of Words can be used as infixes.
> I remember being taught that the -n- of stand is an infix
> as well.
>
> >I *do* know how some vowel alterations arose. In some words, a suffix
> >causes an anticipatory change in a previoius vowel. So, say, in the
> >language Gluk (which I just made up on the spot, ain't I clever):
>
> Thou are so clever. Gluk is such a lucky name for a language!
> But do tell us what "stik" and "blat" mean. :)
stik means "fruit salad." styk is the accusative case.
blat means "armpit hair." Blet is the plural.
>
> >
> >protogluk oldgluk gluk
> >
> >stik stik stik
> >stikum stykum styk
> >blat blat blat
> >blati bleti blet
> >
>
> Padraic.
>
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Living your life is a task so difficult,
> > it has never been attempted before.
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Living your life is a task so difficult,
it has never been attempted before.