From: | Dan Saunders <obeythehamster@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Friday, November 12, 2004, 4:15 |
I have a question about a recently started conlang: Is there any universal I don't know about that prevents a language from having the unvoiced labial-velar approximant, /W/, without it's voiced counterpart, /w/? or /m_0/ without /m/? I would like to add these features, but wish to know how 'realistic' they are. Thanks. Dan.
Roger Mills <rfmilly@...> |