Re: Wenedyk - Nouns
From: | Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@...> |
Date: | Monday, September 2, 2002, 7:13 |
--- Jego skrzypszy:
> > Hmmmm... any specific reason you chose |-i| for the dative and |-u|
> > for the genitive? Or is that a typo? The Latin endings being -o
> > and -i respectively...
>
> In this case, those two forms -u and -i can be justified in two ways:
> - either it is the rather strong influence of the fourth declension (-us,
> gen. -us, dat. -ui)
> - or those early Slavs could be blamed for messing up Latin -i/-u with their
> own -u/-i :)
I forgot to mention one argument, which might be even more important than those
other two: influence from the Latin ablative. A large part of the different
meanings of the ablative shifted in Wenedyk to the genitive, so why not some of
its forms, too?
Jan
=====
"Originality is the art of concealing your source." - Franklin P. Jones
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com