Re: Presentation on Language Creation
From: | Andreas Johansson <and_yo@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, October 1, 2002, 19:13 |
Roger Mills wrote:
>Christsophe wrote:
> >I don't know why but Sumerian popped up in my mind when you mentioned
>that...
> >Is it possible that someone spent his/her career trying to prove that
>Sumerian
> >was actually an artificial language?
>
>
>"Everyone knows" Sum. is a descendant of Ukrainian, or maybe it was
>vice-versa-- as was proposed in a website cited for amusement value on
>Cybalist a while back.
Ukr must be the ancestor of Sumerian, since, as everybody knows, Turkish is
the only true descendant of Sumerian, as is Hungarian. I learnt both
indisputeable facts on the 'Net. And let's not forget that close to one-half
of all European languages descend from Slovenian (namely, all those who're
in any language called anything containing a syllable resembling
ven/wen/van/wan).
Andreas
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com