genocide of innocent cannibals

From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html wrote:

> i'm redoing my pages because some argument i had with
> Joshuah made me realise something important about tunu's "preverbs". these
> preverbs are part of the collection of all the integrators i could find in
> the languages i know (Charles knows them - he thinks they "reify" too much
> ;-). that is to say, they are a kind of list of all -ator, -ance, -ity,
> -ness, etc., plus a breaking-down of voices and cases according to semantic
> variations most used in these languages (i believe grammemes belong to 50
> such aspectivised categories or so - this makes that list look very
> "childish"). but now i realise they are symbols only, which makes me ashamed
> because it's all i could find after 10 years of bungling. this makes me
> wonder whether i should keep tunu alive. i've designed another conlang
> yesterday that is modelled on the "active" pattern and doesn't feature these
> preverbs. and i think it might be a safer personal language. a more serious
> issue : do you want to listen to tunuan music ? i could send you a 1 mn-long
> wav. file. i'm sure you've never heard anything like that before : some much
> more interesting stuff than preverbs :-)
Are you saying you genocided all your language pages
because something may have looked "childish" to somebody????
That's a capital offense in CONLANG, you must restore them.
Make a new lang and let the cannibals fight for their survival.
Once you create something, it has a life of its own which
the creator HAS TO RESPECT!