Re: Laminated affricates? :-)
From: | H. S. Teoh <hsteoh@...> |
Date: | Monday, February 24, 2003, 19:52 |
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 02:28:46PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Recently, I've noticed that Ebisedian actually has several allophones for
> its palatoalveolar fricatives and affricates. The underlying cause is that
> [s] and [z] are realized as laminal [s] and laminal [z] under certain
> circumstances.
[snip]
Argh, I meant "[S] and [Z] are realized as laminal [s] and laminal
[z]...". Grrr....
T
--
Ignorance is bliss... but only until you suffer the consequences!