Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: CHAT: Blandness (was: Uusisuom's influences)

From:Jeff Jones <jeffsjones@...>
Date:Sunday, April 8, 2001, 8:04
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001 03:19:07 -0400, Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> wrote:

> David Peterson wrote: > > But I know at least one person said that there was no [u] in Turkish, > > so you know what those universals are worth. > > That was Japanese, actually. Turkish *does* have /u/. But it *is* > unusual to have /M/ without /u/. Supposedly, /u/ became /M/ because it > was considered polite in the court to avoid lip-rounding. (Tho, why > that didn't also affect /o/, I don't know)
The Japanese I learned has unrounded /o/ as well (perhaps I'd better check with some Japanese speakers the next chance I get). I also note that not rounding makes it harder for lip-readers. While we're on the subject of rounding ... it has seemed to me for some time that the "rounded" vs. "unrounded" distinction is insufficient for phonetic description, since there are degrees of rounding. Japanese [i] as I know it is "flat" or completely unrounded, while English [i] only lacks rounding (usually). Comments? Jeff