Re: A funny linguistic subway experience + some questions about
From: | wayne chevrier <wachevrier@...> |
Date: | Thursday, December 7, 2000, 18:56 |
This character is already in unicode, it is an archaic form of sampi
John Cowan wrote:
>
>Raymond Brown wrote:
>
> > ___
> > On the other hand, the odd letter | | | used by some of the Asiatic
> > |
> > Ionians may well have represented some palatal sound similar to [tS].
>And
> > who know what zeta variously represented in all the early dialects?
>
>Interesting! Ought I to propose this letter to the Unicode people for
>inclusion? (The process takes real time, so if it makes sense to encode
>it, then starting now is reasonable.)
>
>The basic criterion for including an archaic letter like this is:
>do scholars or hobbyists want to include the letter either in their
>own documents, or in transcriptions of original documents? IOW, if it is
>solely interesting to palaeographers, then it doesn't belong in Unicode.
>
>The current Unicode Greek letters are:
>
>1) alpha to omega
>2) all vowels with all possible breathings and/or accents and/or dialytika
>3) math forms: closed beta, open theta, script kappa, ascending phi, closed
>pi,
> tailed rho, lunate sigma, upsilon with hook
>4) kai symbol
>5) archaics: stigma, digamma, koppa, sampi
>6) letter yot (looks like Roman "j")
>
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com