Re: Tenses -- any comments?
|From:||Jeffrey Jones <jsjonesmiami@...>|
|Date:||Friday, July 14, 2006, 0:25|
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:20:39 +0200, Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...>
I modified that page after the original posting; possibly you didn't see
the original (which BTW was more regular, but less logical in my view). I
_do_ have some irregular verbs: the locational "demonstratives" saa, saha,
sane, and sabi along with the corresponding motion verbs, and the
existenial soo. Perhaps I should put these on the same page as the regular
>On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 15:43:23 -0400, Jeffrey Jones wrote:
>> I have a simple tense system here:
>> I'm posting here because I feel it needs corrections.
> I think it makes perfect sense the way it is. Perhaps a bit more logical
> and regular than what one would expect in a natlang, but well, there
> *are* a few highly regular natlangs around.
>... brought to you by the Weeping Elf