Re: TYPOLOGY: (conlangs and natlangs): "Tense-Prominent" vs "Aspect-Prominent"

>Eldin Raigmore <eldin_raigmore@...> wrote:
>That might not be all there is to it at all. Languages with
>evidentials may be "Mood-Prominent", or at least "Evidential-
>Prominent", rather than either Aspect-Prominent or Tense-
>Prominent.
Senjecas is "mood-prominent."  The verb is inflected only for mood,
tense being indicated by the use of particles for past or future. Four
moods: indicative, subjunctive, imperative, and relative.

>Where did you get that idea to put it in your conlang?
I read some of Lehmann's works in PIE.  He says, if I read him
correctly, that verbs in pre-PIE were not inflected.