Re: conlang classification and productivity
|From:||Scott W. Hlad <scott@...>|
|Date:||Monday, February 19, 2001, 15:17|
Oh, thank you. On that rating then, Teran is
L 0.5 G 2.5 T 0.5 C? P 5 S 5
I need to understand conculture a bit more.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Constructed Languages List [mailto:CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU]On
> Behalf Of Padraic Brown
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 7:38 AM
> To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
> Subject: Re: conlang classification and productivity
> This message concerns the new standard (?) in conlang
> classification systems. As has been mentioned, the
> Lagrateck PS system is an abbreviation for Lexicon,
> Grammar, Text Corpus, Conculture, Phonology, Script;
> each on a 0 to 5 scale where 0 = no work done and 5
> = "perfect".
> In the example I gave, Kerno is L3 G4.5 T4 C4 P2 S5.
> The Lexicon is small, the grammar is nearly "complete",
> there are a number of texts (some fairly long), the
> conculture is fairly well worked out, I haven't worked
> much on the phonology (but I know how the language sounds)
> and the script is complete or perfect.
> That's the quick-n-dirty. It's a simple system, but
> quite subjective as it requires you to make relative
> judgements concerning how far along your conlangs are.
> Regards, and welcome to the list!
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Scott W. Hlad wrote:
> >Hello everyone again.
> >Well, I belong to several lists, but I must confess that this is the
> >friendliest welcome I have ever received. I have had some kind words said
> >about Teran, my conlang and some good challenges lain before me in a few
> >private emails.
> >Can someone driect me to what I can read to understand what is being
> >described in this email? I'd like to be able to participate as well.
> >Scott Hlad
> >Scott W. Hlad
> >Teran, a Conlang
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Constructed Languages List [mailto:CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU]On
> >> Behalf Of Padraic Brown
> >> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 7:33 PM
> >> To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
> >> Subject: Re: conlang classification and productivity
> >> On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Christophe Grandsire wrote:
> >> >Well, I know I'm late, but I want to give my ratings too :) :
> >> Better late than never! And before anyone extolls the virtues of
> >> the early bird, just remember that the second mouse gets the
> >> cheese.
> >> As for myself (and keeping in mind that this Lagrateck PS scale is
> >> _very_ relative when compared to a real-world language):
> >> Kerno: L3 G4.5 T4 C4 P2 S5
> >> Talarian: L1 G4 T1 C4 P4.5 S4.5
> >> And a host of L1 G1 T1 C1 P0 S0 languages that coinhabit an alternate
> >> world: Anian, Hoosickite, Pendarvian, Wreynoldian, Hecklan,
> >> Mentolatian, Angeran, Old Iconian, New Iconian, Yllemese, Watuguar,
> >> Gurranian, Ladhinat, and Lingua Lucaria. There are undoubtedly others.
> >> Padraic.