On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 07:06:08 -0500, Adam Walker <dreamertwo@...>
wrote:
[replying to Christophe]
>> > I
>> > mean the verbs will not permit a seond argument of ANY type. You could
>> > not
>> > even say "He went to the store," sine NOTHING zipo nada is allowed in
>> > that
>> > slot. NO arguement of ANY kind, not even in a prepositional phrase.
How about *verbs* as arguments?
>> > In fact you couldn't even have a
>> > compound subject.
>Well you could comcine sentences but you must have only one argument per
>verb.
>
>>How would you translate: "He went to the store"? "He went. To the store
>>went"?
>
>He store went-to was-arrived-at.
Should this example be analyzed as:
(he went-to) [whereas] (store) (was arrived-at) {wich altered order}
- which IMO resembles a verbal argument?
>It was probably the weirdest of many weird things born from this strange
>little cranium.
Weird enough... therefore, cool - if only it works ;)
Basilius
-