Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: C-IPA

From:Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>
Date:Thursday, February 27, 2003, 14:35
En réponse à Andreas Johansson <and_yo@...>:

> > You seem to've snipped part of what you're replying to, but [@}] for > IPA > turned a seems sensible. Was [a-] being [A]? >
No, [a-] would have no equivalent in IPA (unless they modify it to include a low central unrounded vowel). [a--] would be [A], but [A] will be simpler ;)) . And as I said earlier, [@}] is actually incorrect, because turned a is explicitely defined for roundedness (or rather unroundedness). Although I've seen it also undefined for roundedness by checking further, so [@}] may actually be valid... In this case, it seems the IPA is ambiguous.
> > I've spoken about IPA diacritics in this thread? What did I say? >
You did refer to X-SAMPA [s_d]. [_d] is the transcription of an IPA diacritic. So you've indeed confused the C-IPA diacritic + (which doesn't correspond to anything in the IPA) with the "dental" diacritic of the IPA (which is ^[ in C- IPA, unless a better proposal for it comes around). Christophe. http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.