Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Constructive linguistics

From:Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...>
Date:Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 5:49
From:    Sai Emrys <saizai@...>
> Thomas Wier: > > Natural languages are *far* more complex and intricate than any > > conlang has ever been. > > Yes, but so? Weather is far more complex and intricate than any system > for modeling it, yet we still do so and still achieve useful results. > Even if you assume (as I think you are) that a conlang is necessarily > *trying* to be a indistinguishable replica (or rather, exemplar) of a > natlang.
But that's not an appropriate analogy. A good weather analogy would be trying to seed the clouds to increase rainfall, or using windturbines to increase airflow, and then making conclusions about how weather in general works. Your analog is equivalent to professional linguists using theoretical models, algorithms, to predict grammatical and ungrammatical strings. ========================================================================= Thomas Wier "I find it useful to meet my subjects personally, Dept. of Linguistics because our secret police don't get it right University of Chicago half the time." -- octogenarian Sheikh Zayed of 1010 E. 59th Street Abu Dhabi, to a French reporter. Chicago, IL 60637

Replies

Sai Emrys <saizai@...>
Sai Emrys <saizai@...>