Re: reformed Welsh Spelling - comments?
From: | Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, December 3, 2003, 19:39 |
Quoting Ray Brown <ray.brown@...>:
> But the idea was to have one symbol for one phoneme. It doesn't exactly
> take
> long to learn |c| = /k/. It makes welsh no more "difficult" to read than
> Quenya
> or Sindarin.
|c|=[k] is pretty mild. Putting unnecessary diaereses over every odd vowel is
just outright evil ... esp when the vowel in question is an "a" or "o".
> [snip]
> > c=k
> > ch=x
>
> Surely, to any non-linguist |x| suggests [ks]? I can't think of any
> natlangs that use the Roman alphabet which write [X] as |x|. But I can
> think of some that write |ch|.
Assuming that's meant to be [x], Spanish, marginally, in antique spellings
like "Mexico", and dialects that have [x] for that phoneme.
I'd be suprised if there's not some IPAically inspired orthographies of recent
vintage that do it too.
If indeed uvular, what langs are you thinking of that writes it as |ch|? Can't
think of any off-hand, myself.
Andreas
Reply