Re: First thoughts on Prevli or Pervil

Jörg Rhiemeier wrote:
>
> Roger Mills wrote:
> >
> > Personal pronouns:
> > 1st sg. kan ~gna
> > 2nd sg. mil ~bli
> > 3rd sg. --- or zok ~sko ("z" is probably /dz/, phonology not yet totally
> > figured out...)
> > 1pl. kant ~kanta
> > 2pl. milt ~miltä
> > 3pl. zet ~zeta
>
> Which factor conditions these alternations?

Mr. Mills can speak for himself, but I took the first of each of these
to be the independent form and the second to be the clitic form.

--Ph. D.

Reply