Re: Sidestepping Spelling Reform
From: | <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Thursday, January 29, 2004, 20:50 |
Gary Shannon scripsit:
> Secondly, a diacritical mark can mark a syllable as
> having its vowel suppressed so that ugly English
> consonant clusters can be represented as syllable
> clusters with vowels supressed. s'kool (school)
Okay, now you have passed from syllabary to abugida; rendering English with
an existing or purpose-built abugida is perfectly plausible. In particular,
Canadian Syllabics provides a rich resource of available letters; although
it supports only four vowels, it would be possible to repurpose some of the
initial-consonant distinctions to encode English vowels four at a time;
there are over 100 such consonants available, so that should be no problem.
Alternatively, Indic or Ethiopic would be possible as well.
(I think it's a nice feature that the "vowel carrier" letter of CS can have
the virama applied to it and then represents [?].)
--
"You're a brave man! Go and break through the John Cowan
lines, and remember while you're out there jcowan@reutershealth.com
risking life and limb through shot and shell, www.ccil.org/~cowan
we'll be in here thinking what a sucker you are!" www.reutershealth.com
--Rufus T. Firefly