Re: THEORY: Unknown Language Confuser!
|From:||Jeff Sheets <wickedbob@...>|
|Date:||Thursday, February 1, 2001, 2:05|
Lars is correct. Quickly after my post I typed in absolute gibberish and got
a better result than my conlang. I would suggest the comparisons be taken
with a grain of salt, and perhaps considered as the closest real language in
terms of orthography. When I replied early on, I never intended to give the
impression that my a priori language was related to the real languages (the
names of which I have forgotten). My intention was to remark on the meager
similarities of the languages as far as the Unknown Language Identifier was
concerned. Have fun ya'll, I'm going back to lurk mode. :)
"On two occasions I have been asked by members of Parliament, `Pray, Mr.
Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers
come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas
that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage