Re: Types of numerals
From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 17:50 |
> Myself, I'm actually lexicalizing 2pi instead (which, from a
> mathematical viewpoint, is more logical.)
Debatable. You could make a case for π/2 as well, since after all a
circle is completely symmetric and you can start with a right angle
quadrant and replicate it three more times to get one. But π by
itself is the most directly measurable value, as the ratio of a
circle's circumference to its diameter. Radii are, in general,
tricker to measure on physical circles due to the necessity of
identifying the precise center; it's easier to measure the diameter -
a chord is the diameter when its length hits a maximum - and then
halve that value to get the radius.
--
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>