Re: Types of numerals

tomhchappell <tomhchappell@...> wrote:
>
> Actually, if it were really XOR being so generalized, it would mean:
> "exactly an odd number of the following arguments" (as opposed
> to "exactly an even number of the following arguments").
    This is true in the sense of treating a generalized conjunction as a
repeated application of that conjunction.  But, of course, there are several
possible generalizations in the sense that the generalization becomes XOR
when restricted to two arguments.  In my conlang Gladilatian every
conjunction can apply to two or more arguments, and the one which reduces to
XOR for two arguments, "fna ... wo", means, "exactly one of".

 ===========================================================================

                 Dennis Paul Himes    <>    himes@cshore.com
                   http://home.cshore.com/himes/dennis.htm
        Gladilatian page: http://home.cshore.com/himes/glad/lang.htm
       Seezzitonian page: http://home.cshore.com/himes/umuto/lang.htm

Disclaimer: "True, I talk of dreams; which are the children of an idle
brain, begot of nothing but vain fantasy; which is as thin of substance as
the air."                      - Romeo & Juliet, Act I Scene iv Verse 96-99