Re: digraphs
| From: | Lars Finsen <lars.finsen@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, July 9, 2007, 11:13 |
|---|
Den 8. jul. 2007 kl. 21.28 skrev Jörg Rhiemeier:
> Digraphs and diacritics are equally
> valid ways of creating new graphemes beyond what the basic alphabet
> has to offer, and at any rate, digraphs are easier to type and cause
> fewer encoding and rendering problems than uncommon diacritics.
That's why I much prefer digraphs over diacritics. I prefer them over
special symbols too. Maybe I'm just lazy. Urianian avoids digraphs
because enough usual letters happened to be available and handy for
the sounds to be represented, though z for /T/ is perhaps a little
strange, but other strange uses for the z are known (like the German
one for example), and c for /C/ is less strange.
LEF
...from Redalsgrend, where I'm back at work after a refreshing week
of folk music and great weather...