Isaac Penzev wrote:
>Simon Richard Clarkstone wrote:
>
>
>
>>J. 'Mach' Wust wrote:
>>
>>
>>> This'd
>>>require a sign for "audible release", kind of the opposite of <_}> (sign
>>>
>>>
>for
>
>
>>>"no audible release").
>>>
>>>The minus-sign might just work for this purpose, though it's no standard
>>>anywhere.
>>>
>>>
>>Erm. shouldn't the opposite of [_}] be [_{]? Seems most logical.
>>
>>
>
>IMHO, that makes sense.
>
>
Can I be the first to nominate <_&> and <_u\>? or is it <_u\> and <_&>?
I forget.
--
Tristan.