Re: Writing Systems and Biscriptal Children
From: | Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <ira@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, December 1, 1999, 19:04 |
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, nicole perrin wrote:
> So, obligatory conlang reference: those of you who do have gender in
> your language, is it masc/fem? and are masculine nouns more powerful?
Valdyan only has gender on the pronouns, not the nouns; there is
masculine, feminine, common and neuter. Masculine and feminine are
only used for male and female sentient beings, as well as for animals
when their gender is important (like a stallion you want to put to
stud).
If a person's gender is not important, the common gender is used
(like "get a doctor and tell him/her...")
A group made up of both men and women, or of people whose gender is
not known or not relevant, has common gender.
> or, more interestingly, to the female (and male too, but this probably
> has more to do with females) conlangers on the list, do you find
> yourselves dissatisfied with these horrid male-dominated natlangs and
> left brain alphabets,
No. Not consciously, anyway.
> and is this why you conlang -
<tediously patient> No, that's not the reason </tediously patient>;
the tags are because everybody asks me that question and I answer the
same every time.
> and, do you make
> your conlangs/concultures/conworlds female dominated?
Perhaps a little more equal than the world I happen to live in, but
not on purpose because I'm dissatisfied.
Irina
--
Varsinen an laynynay, saraz no arlet rastynay.
irina@rempt.xs4all.nl (myself) - http://valdyas.conlang.org (Valdyas)
http://www.xs4all.nl/~bsarempt/irina/index.html (home)