Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage)

From:<morphemeaddict@...>
Date:Thursday, November 22, 2007, 1:22
In a message dated 11/21/2007 7:08:49 PM Central Standard Time,
fiziwig@YAHOO.COM writes:


> I have a syntax I worked out some years ago that > allows building sentences of arbitrary complexity, and which is capable (I > believe) of translating any English sentence into that syntax, and yet has > only > three parts of speech (A, B, and C) and three rules: > > [AB].B (An A followed by a B can play the role of B) > [BC].C (B followed by a C can play the role of C) > [BCC].C (B followed by two consecutive Cs can play the role of C) > > D is a primitive. > B uses its meaning to modify the meaning of one or two Cs. > A uses its meaning to modify the meaning of B, which can then modify the > meaning of one or two Cs. > > Example: > > The children ran very quickly after the dog. > > Analysis: > [[very quickly] [after [the dog] [ran [the children]]]] > [[very.A quickly.B].B [after.B [the.B dog.C].C [ran.B [the.B > children.C].C].C].C].C > [[AB].B [B [BC].C [B [BC].C].C].C].C > [B [BC [BC].C].C].C > [B [BCC].C].C > [BC].C > C > > Which could then be modified in turn by another B like "Yesterday.B" (using > rule [BC].C) to take the role of yet another C: > > [Yesterday C].C > > Giving: > > Yesterday the children ran very quickly after the dog. > [Yesterday [[very quickly] [after [the dog] [ran [the children]]]]] > > Of course the brackets are just to illustrate the analytic groupings. In > practice the sentence would be written, left to right, without them: > > Yesterday very quickly after the dog ran the children. > > The syntax is simple and concise, and the sentences produced are always > unambiguous, given that each B word includes, in its definition, the number > of > Cs it modifies. > > The slump in the U.S. currency to record lows on global markets this month > has > hit export revenues of oil exporters because oil is priced in dollars. > > [because [unit dollars [of oil price]] [hit(has) [of [of oil exporter(p)] [of > export revenue(p)]] [at-time [this month] [the [on [global market(p)][to > [record low][slump(did) [of U-S currency]]]]]]]] > > --gary >
What are the parts of speech? How do you know what part of speech a word belongs to? stevo </HTML>

Reply

Gary Shannon <fiziwig@...>