Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage)
| From: | <morphemeaddict@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Friday, November 23, 2007, 13:19 |
|---|
In a message dated 11/22/2007 9:16:12 PM Central Standard Time,
mike@STARMAN.CO.UK writes:
> That's a different thing entirely. How can you derive (for instance)
> graphing, topology or set theory from just 0 and 1?
> Mike
>
I was wondering the same thing after my last post.
The objects of those disciplines could be treated as abstract meanings of
various numbers, then relevant rules applied to them.
Maybe.
stevo </HTML>