Re: Font Question
From: | Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, April 6, 2004, 2:47 |
Hi!
Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> writes:
> Quoting Danny Wier <dawiertx@...>:
>
> > That one font in particular has a German _es-tzet_ Ã that does resemble a
> > ligature of long and short 's', rather than Greek _beta_.
>
> Reminds me: I was taught back in school that eszett simply is a ligature of
> long s plus long zed, but various Germans I've met have insisted it's either a
> lig of long s plus short s, or one of h plus short s. I guess the above gotta
> suggest it's long s short s?
h + s?? I doubt that has ever been an option...
'Strahse'? Guakh. :-)
Originally, in Fraktur fonts, int is a long s plus z, thus the name,
as you and Danny noted correctly.
However, in Latin fonts, it is now a very, very obfuscated glyph
variant of a long s + short s ligature. I saw books written with a
more recognisable long s + short s ligature and I liked it a lot.
Yes, it looks nice.
**Henrik
> In Berlin, the street signs use a version that looks _alot_ like
> long s long zed.
You mean darker blue ones with white letters and in Fraktur font?
Yes, then it is definitely s + z. :-)
**Henrik
Reply