Re: Four things: Was: Comparison of philosophical languages

--- In conlang@yahoogroups.com, And Rosta <a.rosta@L...> wrote:

> The unbogus argument in favour of unambiguous word boundaries is not
> that it assists in real-time comprehension but rather that it is a
> necessary ingredient in a language free from ambiguity (in the technical
> sense of that word -- multiple definite and distinct meanings for the
> same string).
The desirability of said unique precision is another matter
altogether, I take it.

Reply