Pronouns & sexuali
| From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 19:08 |
|---|
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Paul Kershaw <ptkershaw@...> wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure I understand your comments, probably due to my own lapses. To provide a
> safe example so we can avoid NCNC flare-ups, let's say I believe that scuba-diving is against
> the will of the FSM, while you don't believe in the FSM.
It's not simply anti-scuba-diving vs pro-scuba-diving, or belief vs
non-belief in any sort of aerial pasta creature. It's
scuba-diving-is-a-choice vs scuba-diving-is-ingrained.
Of course, the choice of scuba diving as the stand-in might be seen to
imply support for the former position. :)
--
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>
Replies