Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: storage vs computation

From:Ed Heil <edheil@...>
Date:Tuesday, June 15, 1999, 22:16
Good point.  The 'Construction Grammar' theorists such as Charles
Fillmore have suggested that grammar is *NOTHING BUT* sets of pre-made
constructions, which are interlinked and fitted inside the other.

Whether you accept those conclusions or not, I think they've made a
good case that a responsible grammar must take into account the
extremely pervasive role of constructions above the word level, which
have idiomatic meaning.

Ed Heil ------ edheil@postmark.net
--- http://purl.org/net/edheil ---

Boudewijn Rempt wrote:

> I have been rather to quick with the d key - I've read and deleted a > message by John Cowan the split second before I thought of something > apposite... > > Anyway, on the subject of storing versus computing language utterances, > it has long before been clear to me that a lot of people speak entirely > in stored, ready-made sentences, sometimes being able to construct a > whole conversation with phrases out of a kind of stock. > > That is, in a lot of contexts, a lot of people use phrases they have > hear before, as a sort of - larger - minimal unit. I know I do myself in > English to a large extent - but I've seen the same thing with people's > native language. And Classical Chinese, of course, consists largely of > pre-built phrases, like famous quotations. Those are used in modern-day > Chinese, too, but I've forgotten the Chinese name. > > To bring this on-topic again - I've once tried to compile a dictionary of > standard phrases for the Charyan languages, but I never came further than > a paraphrase of similar dictionaries that exist for classical Chinese. > > Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.xs4all.nl/~bsarempt >