Re: AAAUUUUGH! (was Re: consport/congaming)
From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Friday, September 17, 2004, 19:02 |
Mark J. Reed scripsit:
> But since when is there an "eternal discussion" about the pros and cons of
> IB?
Not here but on conculture. As Lord of the Instrumentality for both
groups, let me reiterate that non-IB postings are extremely welcome
on conculture.
> Anyway, my problem is an obsession with rules. I can't be happy with
> a statement like "the Dankarans play a chesslike game", or "a
> football-like sport", or such. I'd have to work out in detail exactly
> how each game works. Which is, of course, painstaking and
> time-consuming (not to say tedious, since I personally find it fun) and
> distracts one from the actual business of language-creation. :)
Well, if you wind up doing it anyway, or want some feedback or help,
by all means post to conculture.
--
And through this revolting graveyard of the universe the muffled, maddening
beating of drums, and thin, monotonous whine of blasphemous flutes from
inconceivable, unlighted chambers beyond Time; the detestable pounding
and piping whereunto dance slowly, awkwardly, and absurdly the gigantic
tenebrous ultimate gods -- the blind, voiceless, mindless gargoyles whose soul
is Nyarlathotep. (Lovecraft) John Cowan|jcowan@reutershealth.com|ccil.org/~cowan