Re: loglang syntax (was: brz, or Plan B revisited (LONG))

Hi!

Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...> writes:
>...  But I cannot help but notice certain similarities between
>loglangers and auxlangers.  The same dead-seriousness about their
>proposed languages, and the same sectarianism.  ...
Booo! :-)

I disagree.  I am prone to finding loglangs and engelangs
'nice' (sic!) myself, but I'm not dead serious about my own conlangs
that have some traits of loglangness.  They exist for my pleasure.
(And I publish them in the hope that there are others who find
something pleasing in these conlangs.)  They exist for letting me
think about linguistics and for comparing concepts of different
languages.  There's nothing serious, it's plain fun.

So don't be too serious about finding loglangers dead serious! :-)

**Henrik