Re: CHAT: Being taken for a furriner ...
From: | Joe <joe@...> |
Date: | Thursday, September 2, 2004, 12:53 |
Keith Gaughan wrote:
>
> I keep forgetting to change my list settings so that Thunderbird doesn't
> screw up the reply address. Replying to the list now.
>
> I think this was discussed back in the depths of the list's history. I
> think it's a coincidence that they have the same form, but I'm pretty
> sure the origin of -'s is from constructions like:
>
> the king his army
>
> and the like. It is, after all, a clitic. I think it generalised under
> some influence from the germanic genitive, but it's not actually the
> genitive.
It's a long established folk etymology, which was given some grounding
in the 17th century by hypercorrect writers(Ben Johnson, I think, for
instance).
Hawever, in fact, it comes from the Old English '-es', on Strong
Masculine Verbs. It's attested throughout the Middle English period, up
to the present day.