Re: New Language - WIP
|From:||Ian Gowen <ian.gowen@...>|
|Date:||Monday, July 19, 2004, 18:47|
That sounds good. Sounds better than case-1, etc. I'll probably leave
ablative and genitive alone, since their meaning doesn't change based
on sentence structure.
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:12:15 -0000, Christian Thalmann <cinga@...> wrote:
> Since you have the third case in all sentences but the first
> only in ditransitive ones (which I presume are the rarest kind),
> you could call them "primary", "secondary" and "tertiary", from
> right to left. Every sentence has a primary object, but only
> ditransitive ones have a tertiary object.
> I would *definitely* suggest that you not use the Latin names
> in such a misleading way.
> -- Christian Thalmann