|From:||Elliott Lash <erelion12@...>|
|Date:||Friday, September 24, 2004, 4:55|
Well, I have 4 main related languages, as some of you
may know: Classical Nindic, West Nindic (Hinession),
Silindion and Essamea. The entire family is called
Classic Nindic and Hinession form what is known as
the Northern Nindic branch of Nindic a sub-branch of
Silinestic. The other language is South Nindic, which
forms the Southern Nindic branch.
Silindion and Essamea, along with two others,
Lannelka and South Silic (which are not so defined)
form the Silic sub-branch of Silinestic.
They all use the same roots and from them derive many
identical or similar words. The grammar of all the
languages is derived from the common source, but tends
to go in different directions, as you might suspect.
The problem I'm having is...knowing the grammar of all
the daughter's, I'm not too certain about what the
definitive grammar of Silinestic is. I'll give an
example, to hopefully show what I mean.
"He gave sharp swords and broad shields to the hero"
Nâ vasan nherchein nechver ha rhesein cas penos da
Ethed naw herchín ethaen bo rhedd cath noth i laerwy
Anelë kiréin sampi rondeimma kasta i lairohyanu
Nelsi kiree sikkie nee rendee kasta sinjänu läirejä
Without giving the interlinears for the daughters,
here is what should be reconstructed as the common
*anta-ti: (o:) sjarski-j itt-ani: emopod roda-j kasta
give-pst (he) sword-pl bite-prp. and shield-pl broad
nods je la:jros-ja
unto the hero-pl
*a-nel-si: kira-j-n sapni naj rodno-j-n kasta
AUG-give-pst sword-pl-AC sharp and shield-pl-ACC broad
The problem I'm having is how to relate the two
proto-languages into one common Silinestic. It seems
like the main differences between Silic and Nindic in
the stages given above are vocabulary based. So I'm
not sure what the original Silinestic vocabulary might
have been..at least in this case.
Anyways, what do you all think?
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!