Re: TAK
From: | Jim Henry <jimhenry1973@...> |
Date: | Friday, January 9, 2009, 18:46 |
2009/1/9 Chris Wright <dhasenan@...>:
> 2009/1/9 Marta Teresa Perlińska <mtperl@...>:
>> I did not remember the circumstances of this conversation. could you remind
>> it to me?
>
> I think this was intended for an individual and misposted to the list.
See here:
http://archives.conlang.info/zi/shaurjan/kuelpelgal.html
I got sick right after we started working on TAK and
wasn't able to contribute much to it after the first week
or so. I think TAK lasted just a couple more weeks before
all the participants lost interest or got busy with other
responsibilities; there have been hardly any posts
to the forum since late October.
In principle I would be willing to consider getting
involved in another collaborative conlang, but
wouldn't it make more sense to try to get TAK
(Lese) going again, since the forum and corpus
engine are still there and available to use?
http://fiziwig.com/forum/
http://fiziwig.com/tak/index2.php
It looks like someone has added a bunch
of sentences to the corpus in the last few
days.
--
Jim Henry
http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/