Re: Pre-Kindergarten diphthong analysis
From: | Philip Newton <philip.newton@...> |
Date: | Friday, September 19, 2008, 17:45 |
On 19/09/2008, Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Philip Newton <philip.newton@...> wrote:
> > Perhaps a better response for that situation might have been,
> > "Spelling is based on a standard pronunciation;
>
> I wouldn't go so far as to say "standard". Especially since, across
> the language, the spelling is not consistently based on any one
> pronunciation, certainly not any modern widespread one. In fact, I
> think the dialects which merge pairs like "horse" and "horse" and
> "father" and "bother" are much closer to "standard" status due to
> their sheer ubiquity. (Thanks, Hollywood!)
>
> Probably better to just say that the spelling used to match the
> pronunciation in the part of the world where the spelling was decided,
> and leave it at that, rather than use value-laden terms like
> "standard".
OK, call it "a specific pronunciation" then.
Cheers,
--
Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>