Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Gaelic things

From:Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>
Date:Wednesday, July 10, 2002, 20:43
En réponse à Thomas Leigh <thomas@...>:

> > Even languages with a small number of speakers -- look at Faroese for > instance. There are *fewer* speakers of Faroese than there are of > Scottish Gaelic! Yet Faroese is in absolutely no danger of dying out, > cause there's no competition from any other language, and everyone in > the Faroes speaks it as their native language. >
You said it: "there's no competition from any other language, and everyone on the Faroes speaks it as their native language". My "and" was supposed to be an "and/or" :)) .
> > But such a situation is usually lethal for a minoritary language > > overwhelmed by another language in its own territory... > > You think? It could be argued that it's the only way for such a > language > to survive -- by having a single, unified standard for literature, the > media, etc., as opposed to just several divergent regional dialects. >
My point was not about the existence of a unified standard but about the existence of divergent dialects. A language like Irish cannot afford having divergent dialects while its total number of speakers is so low and nearly all of them are bilingual in English too. Dialects are usually a richness for a language, but too much richness for too few people is as deadly as too much poverty for too many people. It divides their already small community into smaller communities with only partial understanding with each other, and is not good for the image of the Irish language itself. The only way for a language to survive is to have weight in the number of speakers, and I mean speakers with full understanding with each other. In this case, dialects are unwelcome. It may not be nice, but it's unfortunately quite true... Christophe. Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.