Re: Phonologically redundant vocabulary

Hi!

Jim Henry writes:
> A while ago there was a thread about using phonologically
> redundant vocabulary (no minimal pairs).  I've been working
> (intermittently) on methods and scripts to generate lists
> of such words.  I started writing something which turned
> out to be a bit long for a listgroup post, so here it is as
> an article on my website:
>
> http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/conlang/redundancy.htm
>...
Nice stuff. :-)

At the time of the thread, I was also thinking of a engelang with a
self-regregating morphology plus redundant word building.  These
are nice tools for implementing a beast like that.

Thanks for sharing!

**Henrik

Reply