Re: Phonologically redundant vocabulary
|From:||Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>|
|Date:||Thursday, April 13, 2006, 13:37|
Jim Henry writes:
Nice stuff. :-)
At the time of the thread, I was also thinking of a engelang with a
self-regregating morphology plus redundant word building. These
are nice tools for implementing a beast like that.
Thanks for sharing!
> A while ago there was a thread about using phonologically
> redundant vocabulary (no minimal pairs). I've been working
> (intermittently) on methods and scripts to generate lists
> of such words. I started writing something which turned
> out to be a bit long for a listgroup post, so here it is as
> an article on my website: