Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: The Unahoben Language

From:Balazs Sudar <conlang@...>
Date:Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 17:53
Jim Grossmann <steven@...> 2002.09.24. 05:38:49 -7h-kor írta:

> Hi, Roberto! > > Sorry for my late reply to your last post. I just wanted to address one > question you asked, namely this one: > > Roberto Suarez Soto wrote: > > (re: vowel sequences resulting from compounds) > > It simply stays like that: "uruilhe". Strong+strong brings a > dipthong, while strong+weak makes the weak one disappear. Is it > wrong/weird? :-? > > > * * * > > It doesn't seem wrong or weird to me! I like your idea of strong vs. weak > sounds. It has a pleasing simplicity, and yet makes your phonology > interesting. > > I like politically correct neuter too. > > :-) > > Jim
Which one is meant to be strong, and which one is the weak? How do you decide? Balazs -- I lúme vin deí asi mosted! May Heaven give you its grace! Balazs Sudar <conlang@...>

Reply

Roberto Suarez Soto <ask4it@...>