Re: The Unahoben Language

Jim Grossmann <steven@...> 2002.09.24. 05:38:49 -7h-kor írta:

> Hi, Roberto!
>
> Sorry for my late reply to your last post.  I just wanted to address one
> question you asked, namely this one:
>
> Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
>
> (re:  vowel sequences resulting from compounds)
>
> It simply stays like that: "uruilhe". Strong+strong brings a
> dipthong, while strong+weak makes the weak one disappear. Is it
> wrong/weird? :-?
>
>
> *               *               *
>
> It doesn't seem wrong or weird to me!   I like your idea of strong vs. weak
> sounds.  It has a pleasing simplicity, and yet makes your phonology
> interesting.
>
> I like politically correct neuter too.
>
> :-)
>
> Jim
Which one is meant to be strong, and which one is the weak? How do you decide?
        Balazs

--
I lúme vin deí asi mosted!
May Heaven give you its grace!

Balazs Sudar <conlang@...>

Reply