Re: Conlang flag design; comments and proposals

>No, I don't mean the cleaner, more visible lines
>(<G>), but the lack of a cuppola at the top.
>Somebody mentioned that the tower of Babel was
>never finished, unlike our previous designs...
>not only does this proposal set this right, but
>it also stands for the way a conlang grows, layer
>by layer, *never finished*.

Good, good, good! That point was mentioned in another thread, and I'm
glad it's been incorperated. The colors aren't to my tastes, but, in
the spirit of iterative design, I'm sure that we'll have several
revisions created in no time at all... In fact, here are my three:

First:
http://lee.kusmer.com/unfinished_violet.png

Then a "light" version (with a very yellow sun):
http://lee.kusmer.com/unfinished_violet_light.png

Then a "dark" version (slightly darker sun):
http://lee.kusmer.com/unfinished_violet_dark.png

-Lee

On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 21:17:38 -0400, Jeffrey Henning <jeffrey@...> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 20:14:04 -0000, Christian Thalmann <cinga@...> wrote:
>
> >http://www.cinga.ch/art/conflag/solartower_final.png
>
> >What's different?
> >
> >No, I don't mean the cleaner, more visible lines
> >(<G>), but the lack of a cuppola at the top.
> >Somebody mentioned that the tower of Babel was
> >never finished, unlike our previous designs...
> >not only does this proposal set this right, but
> >it also stands for the way a conlang grows, layer
> >by layer, *never finished*.
>
> Excellent revision and explanation. Another symbol- this image grew layer by layer,
> initiated by Jan and incorporating suggestions from Leeland, Adrian, myself,
> Christian and others. I'm a big believer in iterative design and think this
> end result testifies to the effectiveness of the methodology.
>
> - Jeffrey
>